|
|||||||||||||
|
Commentary |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
Treating the Gilbert School District as Property
Developer March 2, 2005 Annexation Meetings The proposed agreement is the result of several months worth of discussions between representatives of the city and school. On Monday, February 28, the city council and school board met from 7:00 to 11:00 pm in what sounds like an exhaustive, detail-oriented, and (at times) testy conversation about the annexation agreement. A Matter of Perspective The enrollment of the Gilbert district has increased by 55% since 1990 with a current total of 1,002 students. The new school will accommodate 400 students and is a major development. If any other developer approached the city council with a plan to build a facility, such as an apartment complex for 400 people, and wanted to the town to annex the land, the city leaders would be expected to be firm and thorough in preparing an annexation agreement. It would be the civically responsible thing to do. The Gilbert district covers 48 square miles. Many students live in the northern part of Ames. Only 20 to 30 percent of the students are residents of Gilbert. The city council has a responsibility to the Gilbert citizens to ensure that residents of the entire school district bear the costs of infrastructure for the middle school site — such things as water, sewer, and storm water utilities; pavement and sidewalks; street lights; a traffic study and possible turning lanes or stop lights. In Support of the Gilbert City Council Standing Firm Unexpected Delays and Additional Costs The school district has encountered various delays in its progress toward seeing the new middle school become a reality. Some delay was due to discovering that Qwest had a pre-existing utility line easement that ran through the middle school site — land that the school had already purchased. Some delay had to do with a project manager for the engineering firm that school district hired to coordinate the middle school project. The manager was to serve as liaison to the city, but he and the city lost contact. It sounds as though the liaison eventually left the project. Some delay had to do with the the late letting of construction bids several months after the bond proposal was passed. Additionally, there is concern about the cost of the middle school project. Actual bids to do the construction were $700,000 over what the school board had predicted. The board will also have to come up with a significant amount of additional funds to cover the costs of the infrastructure that the city council is requiring. A traffic study, in itself could cost quite a bit of cash. But if the traffic study suggests that a turning lane is needed, the turning lane itself could cost around $120,000. A person wonders where the school district stands in relation to its maximum allowable bonding capacity and how it anticipates paying for these unforeseen additional costs. Perhaps the school board members are extra sensitive and/or nervous about the growing pile of money it will take to finish the middle school project, and those feelings were fodder for some of the testiness during discussions at the joint meeting with the city council. Still, the school is a developer when it comes to building a new facility to accommodate 400 students. Although, it is possible to make mistakes and underestimate a final cost, the onus of paying for the infrastructure resides with the school district. Miscellaneous Note It was also interesting to learn that
visitors at the joint meeting of the city council and school board were
mainly people with a vested interest in the construction of the new
middle school, including members of the Parent Teacher Organization. |
|||||||||||||
|
||||
|
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed people can change the world — indeed it's the only thing that ever has!" Margaret Mead, American anthropologist |
||||
|
c2002 The Gilbert Gazette
Group |